🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an observance that began as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a commercial tone, growing to encompass functions where African descendants are paid to talk to Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The period has transformed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and more on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the observance is observed is a indication of the current political situation. How it evolves is a valuable example in how co-option leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels emboldened to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in the European continent as a entirety.

In the United States, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the country. A drive to erase Black history and narrative from the archives is in progress. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the observance symbolises how insufficiently it can be effective if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized commemorations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the situation of the contemporary world. It also shows how its short period means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. A university professor, a prof at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a urge to just discontinue things like Black History Month entirely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an era that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an infrastructure that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed across all seasons (as some institutions are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a era that does not avoid political issues, and leaves space for people, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What use is basic knowledge of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Institutions who celebrate it should not be comforted with the passive language of implicit prejudice and alertness to subtle slights, but confronted with the threats that impact society if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and reactive. Maybe an complete renaming is required – Black History is Now Month.